Should you trust parlours without a web-site?

[pomi]

In my ongoing (and eye-opening!) research on parlours, i've noticed that there are a few without a web-site. One particular one in Manchester which seems to be massage-capital of England hasn't got one. This makes me a little worried as I think, rightly or wrongly, that this means either the premises are aesthetically not upto being photographed, the staff don't stick around long enough because the conditions are so bad, they are hiding something or all of the above. I can understand individual working girls wanting to keep a low profile for reasons of safety, but in this day and age when you can get Reviewee web-sites and parlours don't necessarilly want to remain anonymous it just concerns me. Am I being daft?

 

[iamcrazyy]

Which parlour in Manchester are you referring to ?

 

[Kelly P]

I don't want to name names, but It's located on Great Ancoats Street and named after a famous Manchester train Station.

 

[smartk99]

Yes of course you should trust them.

Jackies in Manchester don't have one and they are one of the Reviewiendliest and best parlours around.

 

[Michael T]

Sorry Gary, you're missing my point, you've obviously been to Jackie's and love it. I haven't been to a parlour in 15 years and the fact that Jackie's doesn't have a site that I can look at first seriously puts me off. Makes me wonder if they're hiding something.

 

[misz.deterr]

I don't know if you should trust all parlours without a website. The one in your original post - Piccadilly Selecta - is a well established and popular. I've only ever been once, it was absolutley fine, a very vanilla service, no kissing and every thing covered. It felt completey safe, I had a choice of two girls, both in their 20's and attractive. It was very reasonably priced, the girl was Reviewiendly, not my best ever punt, but I've had a lot worse for a lot more money.

 

[brikush]

I think parlours without websites can be trusted. I'd think that if I were a customer I would go for one with a parlour though, you will have more idea what you're going to get xx

 

[Nami B]

I would not judge an establishment just because they did not have a website, one of my local places that I discovered Reviewom the Sport years ago only got one Quite recently (and just because an establishment have one does not mean they keep it up to date, the pictures of the lovely ladies are of the ladies you get to see and/or recent, or service descriptions accurate!!!) but I would be unlikely to find out about them if they did not at least have some form of web based advertising or presence as these days I do all my research through the web!

For me long gone are the days of using the Sport and the locals looking for massage!

However places I know and trust that don’t have a website include Valentines in Pemassageplanet.netorough, Oasis in Lincoln/Boston and Angels in Lincoln and they all seem to get by without one, but ongoing I think good establishments without websites will become less.

 

[Joan]

Surely if the parlour doesn't have a website then you use the internet to research it, find field reviews and other reviews, so that you know whether it is a respectable or not.

 

[chickens]

Hahaha... why not name names? But yeah, Piccadillys imo is the best parlour in Manchester and i've done em all. £35 for 30 mins in the company of some real lookers. very clean too. Go on a Tues afternoon and see Bianca, You'll have a ball.

I know the ladies at Piccadillys very well and the reason there is no website is they simply don't want one. They make more than enough business by being so well established that they just don't need one.

 

[rposzich]

On the whole the lack of a website is very off-putting for me.

If we were back in the pre-Web days, when I used to see cards in phone boxes that were clearly of famous glamour models, I probably wouldn't have started chatting at all.

For me the main thing is reputation, which is why groups like mp.netchat are so useful.

I'd trust a parlour agency that has a lot of good feedback Reviewom members here ahead of one that has a website, but no feedback.

As we all know, some sites use fake / doctored images....

 

[ezra]

Having said that, I still prefer to see a website and pics of the girl that I plan to see.

Mainly because your idea of a slim, athletic, gorgeous blonde and mine might be very different!

 

[hobojo]

Web sites are good a sit is nicer to window shop first, but you still have to trust the photos are in date and often the ladies facial features are obscured. Sites like this are great for field reviews or general info, which means that the web site is not as important.

 

[akaMaryn]

No website means no pics, so more hit and miss and whilst I would, I don't like walking out if there's no-one there I want to see.

 

[icarus62]

I think there is a little more risk in going to a parlour for the first time that doesn't have a website. But only on the basis that you wouldn't really know/or what to expect e.g. number of wg's there and or what they are like.

But there's certainly no reason not to trust them especially if they come recommended (reviews) or you have been before.

 

[ben a]

Picadilly selecta is busy
but have a fast turn over of staff it is cheap & chearful
no website but the girls a named on the phone
receptionist can lose a few pound on a few but often 7 girls & some bang tidy
after all £35 isn't the end of the world

 

[folk]

sadly every time I saw a wg without a pic i have been disappointed, but to be fair there are no parlours in my area, just indies and agencies.

 

[Top answers]

No website means it doesn't make it on to my list.

I'm only in Manchester occasionally and I want to know where it is, who and what's on offer, what it looks like inside and prices.

That all can't be done on the phone and I don't want to waste my limited time without the above information.

Paddy

 

[Ardnaid Janus]

There are some really good parlours out there without websites, if you only visit parlours with websites you are probably missing some of the best parlour girls around


A website only means a good buisness mind it doesn't gaurantee you a good shag and value for money

 

[~Stormy~]

Then there's the issue of parlours with fake pics.

Like Maison Rouge in Maidenhead.

About to start a thread on that.