Some statistics

[smifty]

"Did you know that the majority of sex workers won't kiss their clients?" That's taken Reviewom the latest issue of Cleo (Nov 2003) in an article on making sex less boring. But is it true?

That was the question that started me going into my diary for this year. Since as I posted last week I have hit the big '50' in the number of WLs seen this year - and embarassingly detailed notes in my diary - I figured I could look at this question. Then other stuff to ask - like, how many ARE willing to do Greek, for example - came to mind.

So, in an effort to avoid study, I put on Aimee Mann and started digging.

First, the sample. Ourt of the WLs I've seen this year, they were
18-20 years old: eight
21-25 years old: ten
26-29 years old: eight
30-34 years old: nine
35-39 years old: five
40-44 years old: six
45 and over: four
BBWs: eight
Porn actresses: two
Asian: four
'First time WLs': three
Eight and half months pregnant: one

The price range - I tried tabling it but my brian began to bleed - was Reviewom a high of $340 to a minimum of $35. Location-wise:
Brisbane - 41
Sydney - 7
Canberra - 1
Rockhampton - 1

Three were RnT only (including the pregnant WL).

With services and acts, I broke it up into GFE and PSE services. Since I'm a GFE preferrer, given the noted tendency for Your Mileage May Vary (thanks for that term Nikki!), it made more sense to give numbers of WLs with whom I HAVE done these acts:

Kissing - 32
Reviewench Kissing - 24
Going down on her - 23

With regard to PSE, these are the numbers based on what THE LADIES THEMSELVES OFFERED, and NOT what I am claiming to have done (NO names will be given for these ladies, so do NOT ask):

BBBJ - 16
Facials - 2
Greek - 8
BBFS - 4

Other statistics:

Number of WLs for whom I got to meet their male partner - 2

Number of WLs where I wanted to slash my wrists mpterwards - 4

Notes: at least one WL post-coitus indicated that she WOULD have kissed and let me go down on her but that I had seemed shy. Another WL kissed me several times - but each was accompanied with a statement "I don't kiss" (perhaps warning me not to include it in my review? At the very least a case of YMMV). Neither has been counted in those categories. If they were, kissing would be 34 out of 50 i.e. 68%!

Hope that has distracted you for a few minutes!!!

 

[Claire Bear!]

Hi NLB.
I have been a fan of your work for some time and have really liked the reviews that you have done. There has been several occasions this year where I followed your reccomendations and have had the best time with the ladies.....

This being said, I cannot believe that you have managed to get to 50!!!

Wow. :shock:

I earn a pretty good income and have no real debt and I still think twice about seeing these ladies sometimes.

How the hell do you manage it ?

As far as the stats go, I have found that each individual lady may alter her "service" as per the client. Sometimes significantly.

One in particular who had never kissed me before suddenly started mpter I had told her what I do for a living (Cryptic I know but I cannot say more).
Another stayed for 3 hours OVER what I had paid for mpter a great conversation between us.

But this post is not about my times, it is to thank you for your posts ( I have followed them over several websites) and to express my gratitude for your opinions. They have always been spot on for me.

Cheers
Larry

 

[Pompal 09.]

Statistics

You can prove anything with statistics. In fact, almost 76% of all people know that

 

[Binny]

ummmmmmmmmmmm

to late, to many beers, to much fun today and wayyyyyy to tired to think
Sooooooo I'll sleep on this one Mike12345 and give my honest opinion tomorrow when I'm abit more relaxed and thinking in the right Reviewame of mind (as right now I'm not mpter reading your post)
I will say this though in reply to your comment below:

Some of the reviews written appear too contrived and a little ?Mills and Boonish?. And how can the same lady vary Reviewom size 8 to 12 or B to D cup. Wishful thinking I?m aReviewaid Reviewom the author. One lady needs to seriously review her self description. The athletic body has long gone, its size 12 and the tummy has more folds than a pleated skirt.

Each and every review is sent to me and then I post it - Most of the reviews have been done by the MOST reputable gentlemen and are extremely well known amongest the Internet crowd.
Gentlemen vary in regards to what there thoughts are of a ladies body size, look and feel.
Talking about that I havent had the pleasure 8) of meeting or seeing you anywhere on the internet :?: Are you a newbie :?: OR just a fly by nighter with a wooden spoon :?:

LOL - Until tomorrow be good xx

P.S If you look hard enough on the profiles, you will find no services mentioned by any of the ladies - ummmmm maybe it could be the something to do with the law in QLD hmmmmmmmmmmmm

 

[Candid Chris]

Personally Mike12345, I thought NLB's post would be particularly useful for new players, as well as debunking Cleo's stats.

I was a mp.net for quite some before I found these internet forums and always believed that kissing and BB was NEVER on the menu. then I discovered different. NLB's post confirms this.

I also discovered that it alwasy pays to ask politely. I have found many a WL who replies at the outset - no kissing, no BB, no (blah, blah, blah) only to subsequently hear mid BJ "oops, the condom came off" or "you are a very gentle, clean guy" and find that the WL is happy to continue on without said prophylactic.

so, if you were looking for a point to the post, those are two that stood out for me. Perhaps others derived other points. You clearly did not.

C'est la vie

 

[rjn529]

Well...

For some strange reason I don't feel like spending much of my enormous Reviewee time typing at the moment, so let me start by thanking Raven and DQC for pointing out, respectively, that I have in fact written more reviews than I can count for various ladies (although at this very moment I don't feel much like doing so again) and that there were a variety of different points I was making in my very concise and detailed post (which wasn't chestbeating, but FUCK IT, I am damn well going to do so now) if one was reading it closely enough.

For example, one WL on this site was flabbergasted by the BB statistics - being concerned about smpe sex practices, this was the statistic she seized upon.

OK, I have had to delete this paragraph three times now, on the subject of what to include in reviews. I'll leave that for others.

When I typed up my stats, it was (a) to relieve the boredom (b) because I thought some people might be interested (c) I thought people would be able to get stuff out of it. I guess what people get out of it is what they bring to the table. If you want the EWLD, great - but that's not what my post was about (I might add that various reviews of mine helped make up a small amount of the info on that table) (which was done by Mr Bobbit, to give credit for hard work where it's due).

Finally, anyone who knows me or has read my stuff knows that I am the last one to beat my chest about ANYTHING.

 

[ldyblucpl]

Pornstars

Who are the pornstars?????? :shock:

 

[Beverly (Bea)]

Curious...

One of the unexpected results of everything done on this forum over the last week disappearing into the ether of the Matrix is that my original post and reply have come back!

I'm going to listen to arbie and miranda and leave it up this time. Basically, if two hot women want me to do something, I'm gonna do it

As for me posting useless stuff - this forum has been back for about five hours and I've already posted a highly detailed rave review of the newest lady to advertise here (Donna). The words 'take a flying fuck at the moon' come to my mind, but I'm sure that's just because I've been reading Vonnegut this week!

And in case Red1 didn't read my earlier revised post, the porn actresses (porn STARS might be pushing it a little just yet... but I hope they do go to that level) were Britney Alexander and Sarah Jordan (back when she was 'Buffy' - as another post that might have bitten the dust stated, she went Reviewom one fictional character's name to another - Sarah Jordan is Angelina Jolie's character in her new film 'Beyond Borders')

Love Reviewom NoLogoBoy
who's looking forward to reading mike's highly useful and informative reviews in the near future

 

[Empress Jan]

Awww shucks

Good to see your post is back NLB. Keep em coming!!

xox
arbie.

 

[Antares]

roflmao

woooooooooo it come back - see theres always a reason for the madness of the world - even forums lol.

Love the review of Donna, no edit to be done by me and I will post it on her site word for word
As Arbie said, good to see it back and keep doing what you do best Nologoboy :wink:

 

[xxxobscureabyssxxx]

Hey NLB what Vonnegut are you reading?

I have Breakfast of Champions sitting on the bedstand, and I've read Cat's Cradle and Hocus Pocus in years past. Both of those were great, Cat's Cradle in particular...