Myarka, I agree the focus on techniques can be very problematic - a saw can make firewood or a Chippendale chair - the difference is in the vision of the craftsman.
Furthermore, treating any symptomatic element out of context has major drawbacks, if we're trying to be alternative, then really we need to open our vision wider. Focusing on the specific is medical, whichever methods we employ.
That said, it's worth knowing about trigger points, although I confess to not having touched one in years, except as a diagnostic. In treatment I usually leave them well alone.
[Nb. every time a patient asks us about our techniques, we risk reinforcing their preconceptions and misunderstandings. We need to be especially careful about describing out therapy in these terms. I usually avoid any practitioner who lists 1000 techniques. If they need all those methods, perhaps they're lacking something else? Moreover, do they spend all their time on courses, or looking at patients? But I'm going OT]